Track for Band 5 quality assurance test analyst
Checklist
Do each item in order. Tick it when it is done.
Agree your protected time and pace with your line manager, and meet your mentor for a 30-minute start at hour 0.
Module 1 Basics of a programming language , hours 0–20: Evidence 1 (independent).
Module 2 Basics of a browser automator , hours 20–40: Evidence 2 (independent).
Module 3 Basics of an AI assistant , hours 40–60: Evidence 3 (independent).
Module 4 ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level v4.0 , hours 60–64: Evidence 4 (independent).
Module 5 ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Test Automation Engineer , hours 64–88: Evidence 5 (independent).
Gate 0 , hour 88: have your three basics walkthroughs signed off, and your two ISTQB certificates recorded; complete your self-assessment ; rate and calibrate with your line manager; agree your individual learning plan; and sign your learning agreement.
Role foundations , hours 88–268, alongside the core modules.
Module 6 Induction and baseline , hours 88–95.5: Evidence 6 (independent).
Health care foundations , hours 95.5–148, alongside the core modules.
Module 7 Why and what to automate , hours 88–103: Evidence 7 (independent).
Module 8 Programming foundations in JavaScript , hours 95.5–133: Evidence 8 (with support).
Module 9 Version control and collaboration , hours 110.5–133: Evidence 9 (independent).
Gate 1 , hour 133: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : fix a failing unit test and open a pull request.
Module 10 Browser automation fundamentals , hours 133–155.5: Evidence 10 (independent).
Module 11 From walkthrough to real test , hours 155.5–178: Evidence 11 (independent).
Gate 2 , hour 178: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : automate one given manual test case on the fixture site.
Module 12 API, integration, and FHIR tests , hours 178–200.5: Evidence 12 (with support).
Module 13 Continuous integration and DevOps , hours 200.5–215.5: Evidence 13 (independent).
Gate 3 , hour 215.5: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : triage and fix a failing CI run.
Module 14 Safe and lawful test automation in health care , hours 215.5–230.5: Evidence 14 (independent).
Module 15 Quality engineering practice , hours 223–238: Evidence 15 (with support).
Module 16 Capstone , hours 230.5–268: Evidence 16 (independent).
Gate 4 , hour 268: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : live run and explanation of the capstone.
Module 17 Lean Six Sigma Green Belt, lifetime certification , hours 268–308: Evidence 17 (independent).
Green Belt certification exam , by hour 308, with your Green Belt project accepted.
Gate 5 , about six months after Gate 4: complete your self-assessment once more, and demonstrate a recent automated change.
Your capability self-assessment
At every gate you complete the full instrument for this track: instruments/band-5-quality-assurance-test-analyst.tsv (see instruments/README.md). It has Part A (21 band dimensions), Part B (UK GDaD PCF role aspects), Part C (skills), and Part D (an automation practical from Gate 1).
Part A: band outline (Band 5)
Part A: job evaluation factors (reference levels)
A factor meets when the agreed level is at or above the reference level. One level below is Partly. Two or more below is Not yet. A skill in Part C meets when the gap is 0 or less, is Partly when the gap is 1, and is Not yet when the gap is 2 or more.
Part C: expected skill levels
Not in this role level: Business and user acceptance testing, Medical device software regulation, People management.
Automation target
Time
From hour 155.5, about 1.5 hours in every 7.5 hours of learning is real automation on your team's product, at this track's depth.
Learning outcomes, at this track's depth
Module depths
Track modules
Capstone (Module 16, hours 230.5 to 268)
Automation candidate analysis for the area, and 10 cases automated at browser and API layers, with traceability, with some support.
You present it to the Gate 4 panel for 20 minutes, aimed at a non-technical audience.
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt (40 hours)
Every track has Lean Six Sigma training. You will earn your Lean Six Sigma Green Belt lifetime certification. You will work with your real team on your Lean Six Sigma Green Belt project. Estimate 40 hours for Lean Six Sigma training.
Your Green Belt project is a small project of your own, on your team's testing process. See the Module 17 module .
Gates and practicals
Gates are at programme hours 88, 133, 178, 215.5, and 268, and Gate 5 follows about six months after Gate 4. Each Part D practical takes 60 minutes . The tasks and marking notes for this track are in Part D practicals . Thresholds and conditions are in the gates overview .
Mentor
Your mentor is at least one band above you (Band 6 or higher) and at or above your automation target in test engineering (Working, with support). One mentor supports up to 3 participants.
Self-assessment The capability self-assessment for this track, which every gate repeats: 49 items,
21 in Part A, 18 in Part B, and
10 in Part C. Part D, the automation practical, is assessed at the gate.
Before the gate, rate yourself on every item and write evidence. Rate what you do regularly. Your line manager rates you separately, in their own browser or on the exported file. Meet, agree each rating using the evidence, and record the agreed rating. Only agreed ratings count. Export the TSV for your gate review. Your mentor or training lead can also score it with scripts/capability_index.py. Read the calibration guide first, and see the instruments for the scoring rules. Your answers stay in this browser.
Capability index Gate Gate 0 Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 Gate 4 Gate 5
Gate 0 is the baseline, with no threshold. Baseline, no threshold. The individual learning plan is agreed and signed.
Part A: band The 5 band outline dimensions, and the 16 job evaluation factors rated as the level you work at regularly.
Part A item 1 Band outline: Knowledge Professional or technical knowledge, typically from a degree or equivalent experience.
Rate against: Band 5: Professional or technical knowledge, typically from a degree or equivalent experience.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 2 Band outline: Autonomy Works to broad objectives within professional standards; plans own work.
Rate against: Band 5: Works to broad objectives within professional standards; plans own work.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 3 Band outline: Scope Own professional work within a team or product.
Rate against: Band 5: Own professional work within a team or product.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 4 Band outline: Leadership May guide and check the work of support staff and apprentices.
Rate against: Band 5: May guide and check the work of support staff and apprentices.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 5 Band outline: Accountability Quality of own professional work.
Rate against: Band 5: Quality of own professional work.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 6 Job evaluation factor: Communication and relationship skills Skills needed to communicate with, and build relationships with, colleagues, patients, the public, and partners. Considers how complex, sensitive, or contentious the information is, and any barriers to understanding or acceptance.
Expected: level 4 1: Gives and receives routine information orally, mainly with colleagues. 2: Gives and receives routine information orally, in writing, or electronically, with colleagues and others. 3: Gives routine information needing tact or persuasion, or complex or sensitive information, or straightforward training to groups. 4: Gives complex, sensitive, or contentious information needing persuasion, negotiation, or training skills, or highly complex information. 5: Gives highly complex or contentious information needing developed persuasion and negotiation, presents to large groups, or communicates where there are significant barriers to acceptance. 6: Gives highly complex, highly contentious information where there are significant barriers to acceptance, using the highest level of communication skills. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 7 Job evaluation factor: Knowledge, training, and experience The knowledge and experience needed to do the job, from any source, including formal training, qualifications, and experience.
Expected: level 5 1: A few routine procedures, learned on the job in a short induction. 2: A range of routine procedures, learned through on-the-job training and induction. 3: A range of procedures, some non-routine, needing base-level theory (for example a level 3 qualification or equivalent experience). 4: A range of procedures, mostly non-routine, needing intermediate theory (for example a foundation degree or equivalent experience). 5: Expertise in a specialism, underpinned by theory or practical experience (degree level or equivalent). 6: Specialist knowledge across the range of the specialism (postgraduate diploma level or equivalent). 7: Highly developed specialist knowledge across the range of the specialism (master's level or equivalent). 8: Advanced knowledge (doctorate plus further training or equivalent), or specialist knowledge across more than one discipline built over a long period. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 8 Job evaluation factor: Analytical and judgemental skills The analysis and judgement needed to process information, solve problems, and make decisions.
Expected: level 3 1: Judgements on straightforward facts or situations. 2: Judgements on facts or situations, some needing analysis. 3: Judgements on a range of facts or situations needing analysis or comparison of options. 4: Judgements on complex facts or situations needing analysis, interpretation, and comparison of options. 5: Judgements on highly complex facts or situations needing analysis, interpretation, and comparison of options. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 9 Job evaluation factor: Planning and organisational skills The planning and organising needed to run activities, programmes, services, or strategies.
Expected: level 2 1: Organises own day-to-day work. 2: Plans straightforward tasks or activities, some ongoing. 3: Plans several complex activities, adjusting plans as needed. 4: Plans a broad range of complex activities or strategies, adjusting them as needed. 5: Forms long-term strategic plans, with uncertainty and effects across the organisation. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 10 Job evaluation factor: Physical skills The physical skills needed, such as dexterity, coordination, keyboard skills, and driving.
Expected: level 3 1: Little need for physical skills. 2: Skills gained through practice, such as standard keyboard use or driving. 3: Developed skills needing speed or accuracy, such as advanced keyboard use. 4: Highly developed skills needing precision or speed and high hand–eye coordination. 5: The highest level of precision, speed, and coordination. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 11 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for patient and client care Responsibility for assessing, treating, caring for, or advising patients and clients. For most digital and corporate roles this is incidental contact only.
Expected: level 1 1: Helps patients, clients, or relatives during incidental contact. 2: Gives general non-clinical advice, information, or services directly to patients or the public. 3: Gives personal care, basic clinical technical services, or basic clinical advice. 4: Carries out clinical care, provides clinical technical services, or advises on the care of patients. 5: Develops programmes of care, provides specialist clinical technical services, or gives specialised advice on patient care. 6: Develops specialised care, gives highly specialised advice, or is accountable for part of a clinical service. 7: Accountable for delivering a clinical or care service. 8: Corporate responsibility for clinical or care services. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 12 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for policy and service development Responsibility for developing and implementing policies and services, and how far the effects reach.
Expected: level 2 1: Follows policies set by others; may comment on changes. 2: Implements policies for own area and proposes changes to its practices. 3: Implements policies for own area and proposes changes that affect other areas. 4: Implements policy and develops policy or services for a service or several areas. 5: Implements and develops a range of policies or services for a directorate. 6: Corporate responsibility for major policy or service development across or beyond the organisation. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 13 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for financial and physical resources Responsibility for money, budgets, equipment, stock, buildings, and other assets.
Expected: level 1 1: Takes personal care of equipment and resources used in own work. 2: Handles cash or valuables, looks after equipment used by others, controls stock, or authorises small payments. 3: Authorises payments, buys some assets or supplies, monitors or holds a delegated budget, or maintains assets. 4: Holds or sets the budget for a department or service, or buys or maintains its assets. 5: Holds or sets budgets, or manages assets, for several services. 6: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's finances or assets. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 14 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for people Responsibility for managing, supervising, training, or developing staff, or for providing people (HR) services.
Expected: level 1 1: Shows own work routines to new or less experienced colleagues. 2: Supervises or coordinates staff day to day, trains others regularly, or gives basic HR advice. 3: Manages a group of staff day to day, teaches core or specialist training, or gives core HR advice. 4: Line manages a function or department, designs training programmes as a main duty, or delivers a full range of HR services. 5: Line manages several departments, or manages training or a large part of HR across the organisation. 6: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's people or HR function. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 15 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for information resources Responsibility for information and information systems, paper or digital, including records, data, and the systems that hold them.
Expected: level 3 1: Records information that the job holder produces. 2: Enters or stores data compiled by others, or occasionally writes reports or queries. 3: Takes formal minutes, regularly writes reports or queries, or maintains information systems as a significant duty. 4: Adapts or designs information systems to others' specifications, or runs information systems for a department as the main duty. 5: Designs and develops major information systems, or runs information systems for several services as the main duty. 6: Manages and develops information systems across the organisation as the main duty. 7: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's information systems. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 16 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for research and development Responsibility for formal research, development, evaluation, audits, testing, and trials.
Expected: level 2 1: Carries out surveys or audits for own work; occasionally takes part in research or testing. 2: Regularly does research, development, trials, or equipment and system testing as part of the job. 3: Carries out research or development within formal programmes as a main duty. 4: Coordinates and carries out research and development programmes. 5: Initiates and develops research and development programmes that support the organisation's objectives. 6: Initiates and develops research and development programmes with effects beyond the organisation. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 17 Job evaluation factor: Freedom to act How far the job holder decides what to do and how, and how closely their work is supervised.
Expected: level 3 1: Works within set procedures, with supervision close by. 2: Follows standard procedures and precedent; someone is usually available to ask; work may be checked. 3: Follows defined policies and procedures; work is managed rather than supervised. 4: Results are defined, but the job holder decides how to achieve them, within broad policy. 5: Works within general policies, and in most cases decides how to interpret them. 6: Interprets overall policy and strategy to set goals and standards. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 18 Job evaluation factor: Physical effort The physical effort needed, considering its frequency, duration, and intensity.
Expected: level 2 1: Sitting, standing, and walking, with little physical effort. 2: Frequent sitting or standing in a restricted position, or occasional light to moderate effort. 3: Frequent light effort for long periods, or frequent moderate effort for short periods. 4: Ongoing light effort, frequent moderate effort for long periods, or occasional intense effort. 5: Ongoing moderate effort, or frequent intense effort. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 19 Job evaluation factor: Mental effort The concentration needed, considering its frequency, duration, and how predictable the work is.
Expected: level 3 1: General attention; occasional concentration on predictable work. 2: Frequent concentration on predictable work, or occasional concentration on unpredictable work. 3: Frequent concentration on unpredictable work, or occasional prolonged concentration. 4: Frequent prolonged concentration, or occasional intense concentration. 5: Frequent intense concentration. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 20 Job evaluation factor: Emotional effort The emotional demands of the job, from direct or indirect exposure to distressing circumstances, such as reading distressing case records or handling serious incidents.
Expected: level 1 1: Rare exposure, or occasional indirect exposure, to distressing circumstances. 2: Occasional exposure, or frequent indirect exposure, to distressing circumstances. 3: Frequent exposure to distressing circumstances, or occasional exposure to highly distressing ones. 4: Occasional exposure to traumatic circumstances, or frequent exposure to highly distressing ones. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 21 Job evaluation factor: Working conditions Exposure to unpleasant conditions or hazards. Near-continuous screen use on most days counts at level 2.
Expected: level 2 1: Rare exposure to unpleasant conditions. 2: Occasional unpleasant conditions, frequent travel or outdoor work, or near-continuous screen use on most days. 3: Frequent unpleasant conditions, or occasional highly unpleasant ones. 4: Some exposure to hazards, or frequent highly unpleasant conditions. 5: Considerable exposure to hazards. Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part B: UK GDaD PCF role aspects Every UK GDaD PCF role statement (Part B group 1), role level statement (Part B group 2), and reference responsibility (Part B group 3).
Part B item 1.1 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst plan, design and execute tests
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.2 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst apply testing techniques and standards to learn about systems and mitigate risk
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.3 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst analyse artefacts and prototypes
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.4 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst test outcomes and record defects
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.5 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst seek to improve testing practices to enhance quality and reliability
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.6 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst recommend testing approaches
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.1 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst apply the most appropriate test approaches and plans based on risk
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.2 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst analyse artefacts, such as user stories, prototypes, processes and designs
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.3 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst determine what to test following an agreed approach
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.4 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst ensure test coverage aligns with business risk
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.5 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst follow appropriate standards to mitigate risk early
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.6 UK GDaD PCF role level: Quality assurance test analyst execute tests, develop reports, record outcomes and support the resolution of defects
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.1 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Analyse user stories, designs, and clinical workflows to decide what to test, based on risk to patients and services.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.2 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Design and run functional, accessibility, and usability tests, including end-to-end clinical scenarios.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.3 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Trace tests to hazards and safety controls, and provide test evidence for clinical safety cases.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.4 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Check data shown to users against source systems and agreed clinical codes.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.5 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Create and maintain realistic synthetic test data.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.6 Reference responsibility: Quality assurance test analyst Track defects through to resolution and retest fixes.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part C: skills Every skill in the reference role level, rated 0 to 4.
Part C item 1 Skill: Communicating between the technical and non-technical Communicating between the technical and non-technical involves conveying information using the most effective medium and language for the audience.
Expected: Working You can: - communicate effectively with technical and non-technical stakeholders - support and host discussions within a multidisciplinary team, with potentially difficult dynamics - be an advocate for the team externally - manage differing stakeholder perspectives
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - listen to and interpret the needs of technical and non-technical stakeholders, and manage their expectations - manage active and reactive communication - support or host difficult discussions within the team or with diverse senior stakeholders
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 2 Skill: Designing and executing tests Designing and executing tests involves applying appropriate test types and techniques to create and run tests that align to user needs and requirements.
Expected: Working You can: - set up suitable environments with some support - select appropriate test types and techniques with some support - design, build, maintain and execute tests that align to user needs and requirements - conduct exploratory testing - research and try new test types and techniques
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - set up suitable environments - influence and guide the use of appropriate test types and techniques to mitigate risk early - lead others in designing, building, maintaining and executing tests that align to user needs and requirements - contribute to developing and implementing standards for designing and executing tests - improve test types and techniques through a structured process.
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 3 Skill: Managing, reporting and resolving defects Managing, reporting and resolving defects involves reporting progress, outcomes and issues, whilst contributing to improving defect management processes.
Expected: Working You can: - collaborate with others to create a defect management process to report, communicate and resolve defects, with support - critically assess dependencies, defects and risks, with support - contribute to mitigation and contingency plans - clearly communicate risks and the impact of defects to stakeholders
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - contribute to developing standards for defect management processes - manage and escalate dependencies, defects and risks across teams - contribute to mitigation and contingency plans across teams - use defect patterns and trends to make recommendations on testing and quality approaches, with support - manage stakeholder expectations and communications during defect resolution
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 4 Skill: Test analysis Test analysis involves analysing information, such as requirements, user stories, designs and specifications, to identify and understand how to act on quality risks.
Expected: Working You can: - work with stakeholders to determine which functional and non-functional quality characteristics add value - determine what to test following an agreed approach - identify and advocate for test needs, such as data, access and environments, with support - analyse information to identify risks
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - lead work with stakeholders across teams to determine which functional and non-functional quality characteristics add value - determine if an approach needs to change based on effort and risk - ensure test needs are implemented early - use multiple techniques to analyse complex information to identify risks - coach others in test analysis
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 5 Skill: Test and quality planning Test and quality planning involves creating, following and adapting quality testing activities to ensure the quality of products, services and programmes.
Expected: Working You can: - create or adapt quality testing approaches based on risk, with some support - follow a quality testing strategy and contribute to its development - contribute to continuous improvement of quality testing approaches, plans and strategies
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - work with teams to develop and implement appropriate quality testing approaches, plans and strategies - contribute to organisational quality testing strategies - implement ways to capture data to drive continuous improvement of quality testing approaches, plans and strategies - advocate for full team ownership of quality testing activities, encouraging early engagement
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 6 Skill: Test engineering Test engineering involves developing test automation solutions that enable fast feedback on quality characteristics. Programme automation target for this track: Working.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain why testing processes, environments and tools are important - follow test engineering practices and standards, with support - support the maintenance of automated tests and tools required for testing
Next level, Working: You can: - use test engineering frameworks and tools to support testing activities - follow test engineering practices and standards, such as source control and continuous integration, continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines - integrate and execute tests to ensure early testing and continuous feedback - create and maintain automated tests, with some support - write and review coded solutions, with some support
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 7 Skill: Understanding health and care services Understanding how health and care services are organised and delivered, how clinicians and care staff work, and how digital services support patient care.
Expected: Working You can: - explain the clinical and care workflows your work supports - use common health care terms correctly with clinical and care colleagues - recognise when a change could affect patient care and raise it
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - analyse how a service fits into care pathways across organisations - work with clinicians, care staff, and patients to shape digital services - explain the effect of digital decisions on care, safety, and staff workload
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 8 Skill: Clinical risk management Identifying, assessing, and controlling the risks that health IT systems can pose to patients, through a clinical risk management process, hazard logs, and safety cases (for example following ISO 14971 and IEC 80001-1).
Expected: Working You can: - take part in hazard workshops and contribute to a hazard log - follow the clinical risk management process for your work - provide evidence for a clinical safety case, such as test results
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - lead hazard identification and risk assessment for a product or change - write and maintain hazard logs and clinical safety case reports - agree risk controls with product teams and check that they work - advise teams on applying clinical risk management standards
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 9 Skill: Information governance and data protection Handling personal and health information lawfully, securely, and ethically, including data protection law, confidentiality, consent, data protection impact assessments, and information sharing.
Expected: Working You can: - apply data protection principles to your work - contribute to data protection impact assessments - handle information requests and records correctly
Next level, Practitioner: You can: - lead data protection impact assessments and information sharing agreements - advise teams on lawful basis, consent, confidentiality, and retention - investigate incidents and recommend improvements
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 10 Skill: Health data interoperability Exchanging health and care data safely and consistently between systems using open standards such as HL7 FHIR, HL7 version 2, IHE profiles, and standard APIs.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain why interoperability matters for joined-up care - name the main health data exchange standards, such as HL7 FHIR
Next level, Working: You can: - read and use FHIR resources, profiles, and APIs - build or test simple integrations under guidance - check messages against a specification
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
View this document on GitHub materials/tracks/band-5-quality-assurance/index.md