Track for Band 3 associate quality assurance test analyst
Checklist
Do each item in order. Tick it when it is done.
Agree your protected time and pace with your line manager, and meet your mentor for a 30-minute start at hour 0.
Module 1 Basics of a programming language , hours 0–20: Evidence 1 (independent).
Module 2 Basics of a browser automator , hours 20–40: Evidence 2 (independent).
Module 3 Basics of an AI assistant , hours 40–60: Evidence 3 (independent).
Module 4 ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level v4.0 , hours 60–64: Evidence 4 (independent).
Module 5 ISTQB Certified Tester Advanced Level Test Automation Engineer , hours 64–88: Evidence 5 (independent).
Gate 0 , hour 88: have your three basics walkthroughs signed off, and your two ISTQB certificates recorded; complete your self-assessment ; rate and calibrate with your line manager; agree your individual learning plan; and sign your learning agreement.
Role foundations , hours 88–268, alongside the core modules.
Module 6 Induction and baseline , hours 88–95.5: Evidence 6 (independent).
Health care foundations , hours 95.5–148, alongside the core modules.
Module 7 Why and what to automate , hours 88–103: Evidence 7 (read and discuss).
Module 8 Programming foundations in JavaScript , hours 95.5–133: Evidence 8 (read and discuss).
Module 9 Version control and collaboration , hours 110.5–133: Evidence 9 (with support).
Gate 1 , hour 133: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : fix a failing unit test and open a pull request.
Module 10 Browser automation fundamentals , hours 133–155.5: Evidence 10 (with support).
Module 11 From walkthrough to real test , hours 155.5–178: Evidence 11 (with support).
Gate 2 , hour 178: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : automate one given manual test case on the fixture site.
Module 13 Continuous integration and DevOps , hours 200.5–215.5: Evidence 13 (with support).
Gate 3 , hour 215.5: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : triage and fix a failing CI run.
Module 14 Safe and lawful test automation in health care , hours 215.5–230.5: Evidence 14 (independent).
Module 15 Quality engineering practice , hours 223–238: Evidence 15 (read and discuss).
Module 16 Capstone , hours 230.5–268: Evidence 16 (with support).
Gate 4 , hour 268: complete your self-assessment , rate and calibrate with your line manager, and do the Part D practical : live run and explanation of the capstone.
Module 17 Lean Six Sigma Green Belt, lifetime certification , hours 268–308: Evidence 17 (with support).
Green Belt certification exam , by hour 308, with your Green Belt project accepted.
Gate 5 , about six months after Gate 4: complete your self-assessment once more, and demonstrate a recent automated change.
Your capability self-assessment
At every gate you complete the full instrument for this track: instruments/band-3-associate-quality-assurance-test-analyst.tsv (see instruments/README.md). It has Part A (21 band dimensions), Part B (UK GDaD PCF role aspects), Part C (skills), and Part D (an automation practical from Gate 1).
Part A: band outline (Band 3)
Part A: job evaluation factors (reference levels)
For Band 3, every factor level is agreed at Gate 0 from your own job description, with a total within 216 to 270 points.
A factor meets when the agreed level is at or above the reference level. One level below is Partly. Two or more below is Not yet. A skill in Part C meets when the gap is 0 or less, is Partly when the gap is 1, and is Not yet when the gap is 2 or more.
Part C: expected skill levels
Not in this role level: Business and user acceptance testing, Health data interoperability, Medical device software regulation, People management.
Automation target
Time
From hour 155.5, about 1.5 hours in every 7.5 hours of learning is real automation on your team's product, at this track's depth.
Learning outcomes, at this track's depth
Module depths
Track modules
Capstone (Module 16, hours 230.5 to 268)
Triage one week of CI results and raise defects; write 5 Given-When-Then scenarios; make 2 reviewed changes to existing tests.
You present it to the Gate 4 panel for 10 minutes, aimed at a non-technical audience.
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt (40 hours)
Every track has Lean Six Sigma training. You will earn your Lean Six Sigma Green Belt lifetime certification. You will work with your real team on your Lean Six Sigma Green Belt project. Estimate 40 hours for Lean Six Sigma training.
Your Green Belt project is a named part of a team project, led by your mentor or a Band 6 or Band 7 colleague. See the Module 17 module .
Gates and practicals
Gates are at programme hours 88, 133, 178, 215.5, and 268, and Gate 5 follows about six months after Gate 4. Each Part D practical takes 30 minutes . The tasks and marking notes for this track are in Part D practicals . Thresholds and conditions are in the gates overview .
With the optional extension to 368 hours, the gates move to hours 88, 148, 208, 260.5, and 328, and Module 17 runs in hours 328 to 368.
Mentor
Your mentor is at least one band above you (Band 4 or higher) and at or above your automation target in test engineering (Awareness). One mentor supports up to 3 participants.
Self-assessment The capability self-assessment for this track, which every gate repeats: 45 items,
21 in Part A, 15 in Part B, and
9 in Part C. Part D, the automation practical, is assessed at the gate.
Before the gate, rate yourself on every item and write evidence. Rate what you do regularly. Your line manager rates you separately, in their own browser or on the exported file. Meet, agree each rating using the evidence, and record the agreed rating. Only agreed ratings count. Export the TSV for your gate review. Your mentor or training lead can also score it with scripts/capability_index.py. Read the calibration guide first, and see the instruments for the scoring rules. Your answers stay in this browser.
Capability index Gate Gate 0 Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 Gate 4 Gate 5
Gate 0 is the baseline, with no threshold. Baseline, no threshold. The individual learning plan is agreed and signed.
Part A: band The 5 band outline dimensions, and the 16 job evaluation factors rated as the level you work at regularly.
Part A item 1 Band outline: Knowledge Knowledge of a range of procedures, some non-routine; typically a level 3 qualification or equivalent experience.
Rate against: Band 3: Knowledge of a range of procedures, some non-routine; typically a level 3 qualification or equivalent experience.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 2 Band outline: Autonomy Works within procedures; decides how to organise own work; refers problems upward.
Rate against: Band 3: Works within procedures; decides how to organise own work; refers problems upward.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 3 Band outline: Scope Own work and some tasks for the wider team.
Rate against: Band 3: Own work and some tasks for the wider team.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 4 Band outline: Leadership May allocate routine work or train others in procedures.
Rate against: Band 3: May allocate routine work or train others in procedures.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 5 Band outline: Accountability Accuracy of own work and of records kept.
Rate against: Band 3: Accuracy of own work and of records kept.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 6 Job evaluation factor: Communication and relationship skills Skills needed to communicate with, and build relationships with, colleagues, patients, the public, and partners. Considers how complex, sensitive, or contentious the information is, and any barriers to understanding or acceptance.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Gives and receives routine information orally, mainly with colleagues. 2: Gives and receives routine information orally, in writing, or electronically, with colleagues and others. 3: Gives routine information needing tact or persuasion, or complex or sensitive information, or straightforward training to groups. 4: Gives complex, sensitive, or contentious information needing persuasion, negotiation, or training skills, or highly complex information. 5: Gives highly complex or contentious information needing developed persuasion and negotiation, presents to large groups, or communicates where there are significant barriers to acceptance. 6: Gives highly complex, highly contentious information where there are significant barriers to acceptance, using the highest level of communication skills. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 7 Job evaluation factor: Knowledge, training, and experience The knowledge and experience needed to do the job, from any source, including formal training, qualifications, and experience.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: A few routine procedures, learned on the job in a short induction. 2: A range of routine procedures, learned through on-the-job training and induction. 3: A range of procedures, some non-routine, needing base-level theory (for example a level 3 qualification or equivalent experience). 4: A range of procedures, mostly non-routine, needing intermediate theory (for example a foundation degree or equivalent experience). 5: Expertise in a specialism, underpinned by theory or practical experience (degree level or equivalent). 6: Specialist knowledge across the range of the specialism (postgraduate diploma level or equivalent). 7: Highly developed specialist knowledge across the range of the specialism (master's level or equivalent). 8: Advanced knowledge (doctorate plus further training or equivalent), or specialist knowledge across more than one discipline built over a long period. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 8 Job evaluation factor: Analytical and judgemental skills The analysis and judgement needed to process information, solve problems, and make decisions.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Judgements on straightforward facts or situations. 2: Judgements on facts or situations, some needing analysis. 3: Judgements on a range of facts or situations needing analysis or comparison of options. 4: Judgements on complex facts or situations needing analysis, interpretation, and comparison of options. 5: Judgements on highly complex facts or situations needing analysis, interpretation, and comparison of options. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 9 Job evaluation factor: Planning and organisational skills The planning and organising needed to run activities, programmes, services, or strategies.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Organises own day-to-day work. 2: Plans straightforward tasks or activities, some ongoing. 3: Plans several complex activities, adjusting plans as needed. 4: Plans a broad range of complex activities or strategies, adjusting them as needed. 5: Forms long-term strategic plans, with uncertainty and effects across the organisation. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 10 Job evaluation factor: Physical skills The physical skills needed, such as dexterity, coordination, keyboard skills, and driving.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Little need for physical skills. 2: Skills gained through practice, such as standard keyboard use or driving. 3: Developed skills needing speed or accuracy, such as advanced keyboard use. 4: Highly developed skills needing precision or speed and high hand–eye coordination. 5: The highest level of precision, speed, and coordination. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 11 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for patient and client care Responsibility for assessing, treating, caring for, or advising patients and clients. For most digital and corporate roles this is incidental contact only.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Helps patients, clients, or relatives during incidental contact. 2: Gives general non-clinical advice, information, or services directly to patients or the public. 3: Gives personal care, basic clinical technical services, or basic clinical advice. 4: Carries out clinical care, provides clinical technical services, or advises on the care of patients. 5: Develops programmes of care, provides specialist clinical technical services, or gives specialised advice on patient care. 6: Develops specialised care, gives highly specialised advice, or is accountable for part of a clinical service. 7: Accountable for delivering a clinical or care service. 8: Corporate responsibility for clinical or care services. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 12 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for policy and service development Responsibility for developing and implementing policies and services, and how far the effects reach.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Follows policies set by others; may comment on changes. 2: Implements policies for own area and proposes changes to its practices. 3: Implements policies for own area and proposes changes that affect other areas. 4: Implements policy and develops policy or services for a service or several areas. 5: Implements and develops a range of policies or services for a directorate. 6: Corporate responsibility for major policy or service development across or beyond the organisation. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 13 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for financial and physical resources Responsibility for money, budgets, equipment, stock, buildings, and other assets.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Takes personal care of equipment and resources used in own work. 2: Handles cash or valuables, looks after equipment used by others, controls stock, or authorises small payments. 3: Authorises payments, buys some assets or supplies, monitors or holds a delegated budget, or maintains assets. 4: Holds or sets the budget for a department or service, or buys or maintains its assets. 5: Holds or sets budgets, or manages assets, for several services. 6: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's finances or assets. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 14 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for people Responsibility for managing, supervising, training, or developing staff, or for providing people (HR) services.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Shows own work routines to new or less experienced colleagues. 2: Supervises or coordinates staff day to day, trains others regularly, or gives basic HR advice. 3: Manages a group of staff day to day, teaches core or specialist training, or gives core HR advice. 4: Line manages a function or department, designs training programmes as a main duty, or delivers a full range of HR services. 5: Line manages several departments, or manages training or a large part of HR across the organisation. 6: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's people or HR function. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 15 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for information resources Responsibility for information and information systems, paper or digital, including records, data, and the systems that hold them.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Records information that the job holder produces. 2: Enters or stores data compiled by others, or occasionally writes reports or queries. 3: Takes formal minutes, regularly writes reports or queries, or maintains information systems as a significant duty. 4: Adapts or designs information systems to others' specifications, or runs information systems for a department as the main duty. 5: Designs and develops major information systems, or runs information systems for several services as the main duty. 6: Manages and develops information systems across the organisation as the main duty. 7: Corporate responsibility for the organisation's information systems. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 16 Job evaluation factor: Responsibility for research and development Responsibility for formal research, development, evaluation, audits, testing, and trials.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Carries out surveys or audits for own work; occasionally takes part in research or testing. 2: Regularly does research, development, trials, or equipment and system testing as part of the job. 3: Carries out research or development within formal programmes as a main duty. 4: Coordinates and carries out research and development programmes. 5: Initiates and develops research and development programmes that support the organisation's objectives. 6: Initiates and develops research and development programmes with effects beyond the organisation. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 17 Job evaluation factor: Freedom to act How far the job holder decides what to do and how, and how closely their work is supervised.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Works within set procedures, with supervision close by. 2: Follows standard procedures and precedent; someone is usually available to ask; work may be checked. 3: Follows defined policies and procedures; work is managed rather than supervised. 4: Results are defined, but the job holder decides how to achieve them, within broad policy. 5: Works within general policies, and in most cases decides how to interpret them. 6: Interprets overall policy and strategy to set goals and standards. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 18 Job evaluation factor: Physical effort The physical effort needed, considering its frequency, duration, and intensity.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Sitting, standing, and walking, with little physical effort. 2: Frequent sitting or standing in a restricted position, or occasional light to moderate effort. 3: Frequent light effort for long periods, or frequent moderate effort for short periods. 4: Ongoing light effort, frequent moderate effort for long periods, or occasional intense effort. 5: Ongoing moderate effort, or frequent intense effort. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 19 Job evaluation factor: Mental effort The concentration needed, considering its frequency, duration, and how predictable the work is.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: General attention; occasional concentration on predictable work. 2: Frequent concentration on predictable work, or occasional concentration on unpredictable work. 3: Frequent concentration on unpredictable work, or occasional prolonged concentration. 4: Frequent prolonged concentration, or occasional intense concentration. 5: Frequent intense concentration. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 20 Job evaluation factor: Emotional effort The emotional demands of the job, from direct or indirect exposure to distressing circumstances, such as reading distressing case records or handling serious incidents.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Rare exposure, or occasional indirect exposure, to distressing circumstances. 2: Occasional exposure, or frequent indirect exposure, to distressing circumstances. 3: Frequent exposure to distressing circumstances, or occasional exposure to highly distressing ones. 4: Occasional exposure to traumatic circumstances, or frequent exposure to highly distressing ones. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Evidence
Development action
Part A item 21 Job evaluation factor: Working conditions Exposure to unpleasant conditions or hazards. Near-continuous screen use on most days counts at level 2.
Expected: agree at Gate 0 1: Rare exposure to unpleasant conditions. 2: Occasional unpleasant conditions, frequent travel or outdoor work, or near-continuous screen use on most days. 3: Frequent unpleasant conditions, or occasional highly unpleasant ones. 4: Some exposure to hazards, or frequent highly unpleasant conditions. 5: Considerable exposure to hazards. Expected (Gate 0) Not agreed Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Self Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Manager Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Agreed Not rated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Evidence
Development action
Part B: UK GDaD PCF role aspects Every UK GDaD PCF role statement (Part B group 1), role level statement (Part B group 2), and reference responsibility (Part B group 3).
Part B item 1.1 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst plan, design and execute tests
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.2 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst apply testing techniques and standards to learn about systems and mitigate risk
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.3 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst analyse artefacts and prototypes
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.4 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst test outcomes and record defects
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.5 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst seek to improve testing practices to enhance quality and reliability
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 1.6 UK GDaD PCF role: Quality assurance test analyst recommend testing approaches
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.1 UK GDaD PCF role level: Associate quality assurance test analyst follow and apply test approaches, plans and strategies, under supervision
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.2 UK GDaD PCF role level: Associate quality assurance test analyst analyse artefacts, such as user stories, prototypes, processes and designs, with support
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.3 UK GDaD PCF role level: Associate quality assurance test analyst use basic functional and non-functional testing techniques
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 2.4 UK GDaD PCF role level: Associate quality assurance test analyst increase your understanding of how to design and execute basic tests, develop reports, record outcomes and support the resolution of defects
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.1 Reference responsibility: Associate quality assurance test analyst Run test scripts for clinical and administrative workflows under supervision, recording results accurately.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.2 Reference responsibility: Associate quality assurance test analyst Raise clear defect reports, including the steps, data, and screens involved.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.3 Reference responsibility: Associate quality assurance test analyst Use synthetic test data and never use real patient data in test environments.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.4 Reference responsibility: Associate quality assurance test analyst Learn the team's test approaches, tools, and the clinical safety process.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part B item 3.5 Reference responsibility: Associate quality assurance test analyst Take part in team ceremonies such as stand-ups, planning, and retrospectives.
Self Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Manager Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Agreed Not rated Not yet Partly Meets
Evidence
Development action
Part C: skills Every skill in the reference role level, rated 0 to 4.
Part C item 1 Skill: Communicating between the technical and non-technical Communicating between the technical and non-technical involves conveying information using the most effective medium and language for the audience.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain why it's important to communicate technical concepts in non-technical language - explain the types of communication that can be used with internal and external stakeholders, and their impact
Next level, Working: You can: - communicate effectively with technical and non-technical stakeholders - support and host discussions within a multidisciplinary team, with potentially difficult dynamics - be an advocate for the team externally - manage differing stakeholder perspectives
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 2 Skill: Designing and executing tests Designing and executing tests involves applying appropriate test types and techniques to create and run tests that align to user needs and requirements.
Expected: Awareness You can: - contribute to deciding the most appropriate test types and techniques to use - follow guidance to design, build and maintain simple tests that align to user needs and requirements - execute simple tests with support - explain the value of automation within testing
Next level, Working: You can: - set up suitable environments with some support - select appropriate test types and techniques with some support - design, build, maintain and execute tests that align to user needs and requirements - conduct exploratory testing - research and try new test types and techniques
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 3 Skill: Managing, reporting and resolving defects Managing, reporting and resolving defects involves reporting progress, outcomes and issues, whilst contributing to improving defect management processes.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain how to report and track defects - follow a defect management process to report, communicate and maintain defects with appropriate information - retest and escalate defects when needed
Next level, Working: You can: - collaborate with others to create a defect management process to report, communicate and resolve defects, with support - critically assess dependencies, defects and risks, with support - contribute to mitigation and contingency plans - clearly communicate risks and the impact of defects to stakeholders
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 4 Skill: Test analysis Test analysis involves analysing information, such as requirements, user stories, designs and specifications, to identify and understand how to act on quality risks.
Expected: Awareness You can: - describe quality characteristics and explain why they are important - analyse information, such as user stories, prototypes, processes and designs, with support - explain what might be a risk in achieving quality goals
Next level, Working: You can: - work with stakeholders to determine which functional and non-functional quality characteristics add value - determine what to test following an agreed approach - identify and advocate for test needs, such as data, access and environments, with support - analyse information to identify risks
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 5 Skill: Test and quality planning Test and quality planning involves creating, following and adapting quality testing activities to ensure the quality of products, services and programmes.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain the value of quality testing approaches, plans and strategies - explain how different delivery methodologies affect quality testing approaches, plans and strategies - follow quality testing approaches, plans and strategies, with support - explain how to measure the effectiveness of quality testing approaches, plans and strategies, and why it’s important
Next level, Working: You can: - create or adapt quality testing approaches based on risk, with some support - follow a quality testing strategy and contribute to its development - contribute to continuous improvement of quality testing approaches, plans and strategies
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 6 Skill: Test engineering Test engineering involves developing test automation solutions that enable fast feedback on quality characteristics. Programme automation target for this track: Awareness.
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain why testing processes, environments and tools are important - follow test engineering practices and standards, with support - support the maintenance of automated tests and tools required for testing
Next level, Working: You can: - use test engineering frameworks and tools to support testing activities - follow test engineering practices and standards, such as source control and continuous integration, continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines - integrate and execute tests to ensure early testing and continuous feedback - create and maintain automated tests, with some support - write and review coded solutions, with some support
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 7 Skill: Understanding health and care services Understanding how health and care services are organised and delivered, how clinicians and care staff work, and how digital services support patient care.
Expected: Awareness You can: - describe the main parts of the health and care system and the services the organisation supports - explain why patient safety and confidentiality matter in your work
Next level, Working: You can: - explain the clinical and care workflows your work supports - use common health care terms correctly with clinical and care colleagues - recognise when a change could affect patient care and raise it
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 8 Skill: Clinical risk management Identifying, assessing, and controlling the risks that health IT systems can pose to patients, through a clinical risk management process, hazard logs, and safety cases (for example following ISO 14971 and IEC 80001-1).
Expected: Awareness You can: - explain how health IT systems can harm patients, for example through wrong, missing, or delayed information - report a possible clinical safety issue through the right route
Next level, Working: You can: - take part in hazard workshops and contribute to a hazard log - follow the clinical risk management process for your work - provide evidence for a clinical safety case, such as test results
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
Part C item 9 Skill: Information governance and data protection Handling personal and health information lawfully, securely, and ethically, including data protection law, confidentiality, consent, data protection impact assessments, and information sharing.
Expected: Awareness You can: - follow the organisation's rules for handling personal and health information - recognise and report a data breach or near miss
Next level, Working: You can: - apply data protection principles to your work - contribute to data protection impact assessments - handle information requests and records correctly
Self Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Manager Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Agreed Not rated 0 Not yet 1 Awareness 2 Working 3 Practitioner 4 Expert
Evidence
Development action
View this document on GitHub materials/tracks/band-3/index.md